State Parks smoking ban headed for court fight

A policy to ban smoking in public places such as parks, pools and playgrounds — enacted by the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation last month — has come under fire from a smoker's rights group, which is threatening to sue the state. On April 9, the state parks agency announced the new policy would create smoke-free areas around all playgrounds, swimming pools, beaches, pavilions and outdoor seating areas that are nearby concession stands. Violators will be informed by state park staff of the smoking prohibition, with those refusing to comply being cited by State Park Police for disorderly conduct.

 With the very first paragraph of the announcement boasting the agency autonomously created the ban, State Parks Commissioner Rose Harvey said at the time, "it makes sense to ensure all visitors have a place to go in our parks to enjoy fresh air, while also protecting children from the dangers of second-hand smoke and litter from discarded cigarette butts." The fact that the rule was enacted by an agency instead of by the state Legislature is at the heart of the issue though, according to Audrey Silk, founder of NYC Citizens Lobbying Against Smoker Harassment.

 Calling the ban unconstitutional, Silk writes in a letter to Harvey, dated May 1, "the smoking ban … likely exceeds your authority and is ripe for legal action." In the letter, Silk quotes the non-delegation doctrine of the state Constitution, article III section 1, which states "the legislative power of this state shall be vested in the Senate and Assembly." Silk notes in the letter that, despite the power of passing legislation being given solely to the Legislature by the constitution, the ban was "unilaterally decreed" by the Parks Department.

 "As an administrative office, [the Parks Department] can only enforce an existing piece of law or act, through rule-making, to fulfill the Legislature's wishes. In this case, no such wishes exist. In fact, the Legislature has repeatedly declined to pass this specific law for over a decade. The Parks Office, therefore, not only exceeded its administrative mission, not only assigned itself legislative powers, but in fact went against the Legislatures will," Silk wrote in the letter. In asking for the department to rescind the "wrongly imposed ban," Silk requests action be taken in 30 days upon receiving the letter, or legal action will be taken.

Buy marlboro cigarettes: http://marlboroman.blog.com